General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm.

Erlinger v. United States

A plain-English summary from Criminal Defense Resources™, a free resource for pro per/pro se defendants and their families.

General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm. This page describes what a court decided in general terms. It does not tell you what to do in any case.
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
Citation
602 U.S. 821 (2024)
Topics
Sentencing

What did the court decide?

The Court held that, under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, whether a defendant's past offenses happened on separate "occasions" must be decided by a unanimous jury beyond a reasonable doubt (or admitted by the defendant), not decided by a judge.

Why does it matter?

A recent application of the jury-trial rule from Apprendi to sentencing enhancements based on criminal history.

Where can I read the full opinion?

Read the full opinion on Cornell Law School LII →

Always read the full opinion and check whether later cases have limited or changed it. A summary can leave out important details.

Related rulings

General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm.

Get new rulings by email

A short, free email when we add new rulings and resources. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.