General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm.

Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District

A plain-English summary from Criminal Defense Resources™, a free resource for pro per/pro se defendants and their families.

General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm. This page describes what a court decided in general terms. It does not tell you what to do in any case.
Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Decided
Citation
528 U.S. 152 (2000)
Topics
Self-Representation & Right to Counsel (Faretta)

What did the court decide?

The Court held that the Faretta right to self-representation does not extend to a direct appeal. The Constitution does not require states to let a defendant represent himself on appeal from a criminal conviction.

Why does it matter?

Self-representation rights at trial and on appeal are different. Appeals courts may set their own rules about who handles an appeal.

Where can I read the full opinion?

Read the full opinion on Cornell Law School LII →

Always read the full opinion and check whether later cases have limited or changed it. A summary can leave out important details.

Related rulings

General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm.

Get new rulings by email

A short, free email when we add new rulings and resources. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.