State v. Spreitz
A plain-English summary from Criminal Defense Resources™, a free resource for pro per/pro se defendants and their families.
General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm. This page describes what a court decided in general terms. It does not tell you what to do in any case.
- Decided
- Citation
- 202 Ariz. 1 (2002)
What did the court decide?
The Arizona Supreme Court held that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel should be raised in post-conviction relief proceedings (under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32), not on direct appeal. Appellate courts will not decide those claims on direct appeal.
Why does it matter?
In Arizona, the timing and type of proceeding matter for ineffective-assistance claims.
Where can I read the full opinion?
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Always read the full opinion and check whether later cases have limited or changed it. A summary can leave out important details.
Related rulings
General educational information, not legal advice. Not a law firm.